>> SO MOVED. >> SECOND. >> DO WE HAVE TO DO ROLL ON THIS?
[1. CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:07]
>> CHAIR, THAT'S AT THE DISCRETION. >> OKAY. LET'S DO ROLL AND KEEP IT THAT WAY.
>> WE’LL GO AHEAD AND MOVE ON TO HEARING AC AND CH 25002 ZONE MAP ASSIGNING FROM NO ZONE TO GENERAL INDUSTRIAL I1 IN RIO RANCHO I ESTATES COMMUNITY.
>> GOOD EVENING CHAIR, REQUESTING ZONE MAP ASSIGNMENT FROM NO ZONE TO GENERAL INDUSTRY I1 FROM THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING APPROPRIATE ZONING
[4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA]
FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. TO MARK IT SUBJECT SITE FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT, THE SUBJECT SITE LOCATION IN THE RIO RANCHO COMMUNITY DISTRICT.THE PROPERTY SIZE AND WE HAVE IN THE AUDIENCE TONIGHT MY COLLEAGUE HERE DOMINGUEZ DIRECTOR OF THE
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. >> GOOD EVENING.
I SERVE AS DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF TOURISM IN SANDOVAL COUNTY.
AS NOTED PER AGENDA THIS EVENING, THE BASIS FOR WHICH THE BASIS OF WHICH WE ARE REQUESTING OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WHAT IS A NO ZONE TO THIS PARCEL SECTION
[7. APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA ]
36 IS THAT SANDOVAL COUNTY HOLDS AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LEASE WITH THE STATE LAND OFFICE ON SECTION 36.WE HAD THE LEASE NOW, OH GOSH, 8 YEARS NOW. WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH THE LAND OFFICE UNDERSTANDING
[8. PUBLIC HEARINGS ]
THAT THE ROLES AND THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE ECONOMIC LEASE PARCELS FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND JOB CREATION.TO TAKE THE ZONE FROM NO ZONE TO WHAT IS BEING REQUESTING AS GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT SOMETHING THAT THE STATE LAND OFFICE DOES SUPPORT. IN FACT, THE DIRECTOR OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION UNDER THE STATE LAND OFFICE MICHAEL SAGE DOES SUPPORT THIS EFFORT, STATE LAND
[00:05:02]
OFFICE SUPPORTS THE USE FOR COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.THE NEED FOR SHOVEL READY SITE IS GREAT. HAVING SECTION 36 UNDER ECONOMIC LEASE WITH LAND ENTITLEMENTS IN PLACE AND CONDENSE THE TIMES IN WHICH IT TAKES TO BRING PROJECTS AND TO MARK IT. AGAIN, RIGHT NOW, HAVING NO ZONE HAS BEEN NOTED BY A HOST OF SITES SELECTORS IS, WHAT IS IT? YOU KNOW, HAVING THAT DISTINCTION TO ALLOW US TO MARK IN POSITION UNDER CURRENT ECONOMIC LEASE.
>> ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS? >> I HAVE ONE.
>> GO AHEAD. >> IT IS HARD FOR ME TO TELL FROM THE SITE MAP AND I TRIED TO COMPARE WITH WHAT I CAN PULL ON GOOGLE MAPS AND SO FORTH. DOES IT GO FAR ENOUGH EAST THAT IT IS ON THE OTHER THE EASTERN BOUNDARY TO THE EAST OF UNSER BOULEVARD,
IS THAT WHAT I AM SEEING? >> COMMISSIONER, CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONER SIMPSON, NOT CURRENTLY BUT THERE'S PLANS AND OVER LAY FOR THE EXTENSION OF ANSWER THAT ULTIMATELY CONNECT TO
THE SOUTHERN EDGE OF SECTION 36. >> THE SOUTHERN EDGE?
>> YES, RIGHT ALONG THE SOUTHERN ON WHAT DAN HAS ON THE SCREEN.
THAT'S SECTION 36. ON THE NORTHERN EDGE OF SECTION 36, YOU HAVE GRAVEL ROAD.
CONNECTS TO UNCERTIFIED. >> RIGHT. I GUESS I AM TRYING TO PUT THIS IT WOULD LOOK LIKE UNCERTIFIED WAS CAN WE GO BACK TO THE MAP REALLY QUICK. NOT A BIG DEAL.
I AM TRYING TO FIGURE OUT EXACTLY DOES IT YEAH, THERE YOU GO.
>> THAT’S THE NORTHERN EDGE. >> KING ROAD IS GOING TO COME TO THE LIGHT AT UNCERTIFIED SOMEWHERE RIGHT IN HERE. I AM THINKING, UMM...
MAYBE IT DOESN'T. MAYBE IT DOES NOT. >> THAT WOULD BE FURTHER EAST, RIGHT?
WHERE KING CONNECTED TO UNCERTIFIED. >> OKAY.
>> THAT’S THE NORTHERN EDGE AND THE SOUTHERN EDGE >> IT IS 29TH.
>> IT IS 29TH DEVIATES TO THE WEST ON WHAT WE WOULD LIKE TO SEE. BOTH SECTION 36 AND SECTION 32 AND I WOULD ADD THE OPPORTUNITY TO GET TO ALSO SECURE ECONOMIC LEASE FOR SECTION 32 IS ALSO BEING CONSIDERED.
>> OKAY. >> RIGHT NOW THERE'S A LEASE IN PLACE ON SECTION 32.
BOTH STATE LAND PARCELS. >> OKAY. AND THE IDEA, I'M ASSUMING THAT WE'RE GOING TO TRY TO DEDICATE BUSINESSES IN OTHER WORDS, IT IS NOT GOING TO BE SINGLE DWELLING HOUSING ALONG ONE OF THE BUSIEST ROADS IN THIS PART OF NEW MEXICO.
>> RIGHT. THE PLAN UNDER ECONOMIC LEASE TO POSITION SECTION 36 FOR PROJECT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WOULD BE,
YOU KNOW, COMMERCIAL AND NOT HOUSING. >> GOT IT.
WELCOME. >> ANY FURTHER COMMENTS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS?
NO. >> THANK YOU. >> ANY COMMENTS FROM THE PLANNER?
[00:10:02]
I SEE A LIST OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. IS THERE ANY REASON TO GO OVER THOSE?>> CHAIR, CAN YOU DIRECT ME TO THE CONDITIONS?
>> PAGE 4. THIS DOCUMENT HERE. I GAVE YOU MY COPY. >> I THINK THAT'S FOR THE TOWER, ISN'T IT?
>> THAT’S FOR DIFFERENT PROJECT. >> THAT’S WHY I WAS QUESTIONING IT.
>> THAT’S A GREAT QUESTION. WHERE'S THE WIRELESS TOWER FOR THAT? THE ONLY QUESTION THAT I HAVE I AM CURIOUS YOU CAN DEVELOP WHILE IT IS NO ZONE. I WAS A LITTLE CONFUSING. DOES IT MAKE IT BETTER FOR YOU
TO CALL IT INDUSTRIAL. >> CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONER RODRIGUEZ IT IS MARKETING TOOL.
RIGHT NOW, WHEN YOU DO GOOGLE ZOOM ON IT, IT COMES AS A BEAUTIFUL SQUARE, PARCEL, 500 ACRES AND IT HAS NO ZONE. CURRENTLY, ENGAGED WITH REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS AND HAD SITE SELECTORS IN THE LAST YEAR. SIX OF THEM SAY, HEY, WE ARE BUSY. ZOOM ONSITE AND IT DOES SHOW UP AS THAT. THE STATE LAND OFFICE DOES A GOOD JOB OF MARKETING AND PROMOTING, YOU KNOW, STATE LANDS THAT ARE ABLE FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT USE.
PEOPLE ARE BUSY IN THE DAYS THAT WE LIVE ON IT AND IT IS NO ZONE.
RACES QUESTIONS, IT IS RAISING OR ANIMAL PRESERVE.
MOST EASILY DEFINED THAT WAY. >> THANK YOU. >> YOU’RE WELCOME.
GOOD QUESTION. >> I’M GOOD, MR. CHAIR. >> WELL, LET'S MOVE ON.
>> MR. CHAIR, IF WE ARE DONE WITH QUESTIONS I WOULD LIKE TO CALL FOR A MOTION.
>> I WAS JUST GOING TO CALL FOR A MOTION. YOU BEAT ME TO IT.
DO YOU HAVE A MOTION? >> I DO. A ZONE MAP ASSIGNMENT FROM NO ZONE TO GENERAL INDUSTRIAL I 1 IN RIO RANCHO ESTATES COMMUNITY DISTRICT AS RECOMMENDED BY PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
STAFF. >> DO WE HAVE A SECOND? >> I WILL SECOND THAT MOTION, YES.
>> YOU’RE WELCOME. OKAY. MOTION PASSES. SO LET'S MOVE ON TO THE NEXT ISSUE.
WHICH IS HEARING BCU 24008. WE DO HAVE SEVERAL PEOPLE THAT WANT TO SPEAK ON THAT.
WE WILL ASK THEM TO GET SWORN IN AT THIS TIME.
>> YES. CHAIR, I RECOMMENDED EVERYBODY GET SWORN AT THIS TIME AND I WILL INTRODUCE THE PROJECT AND THEN ONCE I INTRODUCE THE PROJECT, THEN AT YOUR DISCRETION THE FOLKS WOULD PROCEED TO SPEAK TO THE ISSUE.
>> VERY GOOD. OKAY. THOSE THAT WANT TO SPEAK WE HAVE MIKE POWERS AND CHRISTOPHER.
CAN YOU PLEASE STAND. (SWEARING IN). >> THANK YOU.
>> I WILL PROCEED WITH THE AN APPLICATION PRESENTATION. THE APPLICANT ARE REQUESTING PERSONAL
[00:15:01]
USE PERMIT OF CONSTRUCTION OF NEW 199 FOOT COMMUNICATION TOWER.THIS IS THE FIRST THAT I'VE BROUGHT BEFORE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SINCE I HAVE BEEN HERE IN ALMOST 2 YEARS. WHAT WE SEE ARE MODIFICATIONS.
THIS IS THE SECOND ONE THAT HAS EVEN BEEN DISCUSSED AND THE FIRST OF TWO THAT HAVE ACTUALLY SUBMITTED AN ENTIRE APPLICATION.
DURING THIS PROCESS, WE HAVE CHANGED VENDORS SO WE GOT A NEW VENDOR THAT IS ASSISTING WITH THE APPLICATION.
SO I JUST WANT TO PREFACE BY GIVING YOU BACKGROUND.
THE PROPOSED TOWER DESIGNED TO COMPLETE THE TOTAL OF FIVE SERVICE PROVIDERS AND THIS IS LOCATED 537 COUNTY ROAD 11 NEAR CUBA. THE APPLICANT ARE ATLAS TOWER.
POINT OF CONTACT ACRES. THE CURRENT ZONE IS RURAL RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL.
AND IN DISTRICT 5, OF COURSE. RECOMMENDATION, AS APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS AND I WILL GET TO THOSE IN A SECOND.
THE APPLICATION FOR THIS CONDITION USE PERMIT CURRENTLY CONTAINS EQUIPMENT FOX OF SERVICE PROVIDER, VERIZON WIRELESS.
THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, NOT ONLY TO THE 25 HUNDRED SQUARE FOOTPRINT OF THE TOWER AND EQUIPMENT COMPOUND, SO IT IS USEFUL TO KNOW NOT WHERE THE FOOTPRINT MEETS THE GROUND, IT IS FOR THE ENTIRE ACREAGE OF THE COUNT. THE COUNCIL CONSULTANT REVIEWED ALL DOCUMENTS.
THEY REVIEWED ALL DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY APPLICANT WITH TELL COMMUNICATION ORDINANCE.
AND SO I WILL STREAK TO THE FINISH LINE HERE.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION IN THE MATTER OF CU24 08 THE PLANNING AND ZONING STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVES THIS REQUEST BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FINDINGS OF FACT AND SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.
I WON'T READ THE FINES OF FACT TO YOU. THERE ARE 9 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.
FOR THE SAKE OF TIME I WON'T THROUGH ALL OF THOSE, BUT I WILL SAY THAT THOSE ARE INCLUDED AND RECOMMENDED BY THE VENDOR THAT DID REVIEW THEM AND WE CAN TAKE ONE AND LOOK AT IT MORE CLOSELY IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS I PROBABLY WON'T BE ABLE TO ANSWER SPECIFICALLY WHAT THE CONDITIONS ARE.
AGAIN, I HAVE TO DEFER TO THE VENDOR ON THIS SUFFICIENT ICE TO SAY THEY WERE THOROUGH IN OUTLINING THE CONDITIONS.
WITH THAT, I SUBMIT FOR ANY QUESTIONS AND FOR THOSE SPEAKING ON THE PROJECT TONIGHT.
>> I JUST WANT TO SAY THE CONDITIONS THAT YOU SET FORTH FOR APPROVAL, THINGS THAT WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT AND SET FORTH ALREADY IN SOME SITUATIONS LIKE THE BLOCK WALLS AND THAT SORT OF THING FOR VISUAL.
[00:20:01]
I PERSONALLY DON'T SEE ANYTHING WRONG WITH THE CONDITIONS.ANY OTHER CHAIRS HAVE ANY OTHER COMMENT ON THAT?
>> I GOT JUST I NEED TO UNDERSTAND YOU'D HAD A CONSULTANT HELP YOU DEVELOP THESE 9 ITEMS, WILL THE CONSULTANT CHECK THAT THE 9 ITEMS ARE MET? YOU ARE SAYING IT KIND OF EXCEEDS THE BACKGROUND OF FOLKS IN PLANNING AND ZONING AND THESE ARE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS AND I WAS JUST WONDERING, IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU NOT ONLY HELP WITH THE DEVELOPMENTS BUT THE 9 ITEMS GET DONE THE WAY THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO GET DONE.
PART OF THEM ARE REFERRED TO WE HAVE SEPARATE WIRELESS ORDINANCE NOT PART OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE.
THIS COMPANY IS AWARE OF THE DIFFERENT NATIONAL I SHOULD SAY FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS THAT ARE SPECIFIC TO THESE TYPES OF PROJECTS. THE CMU BLACK WALL IN ADDITION TO THE CHAIN LINK FENCE THOSE ARE STANDARDS OF THE INDUSTRY THAT THEY'RE ASKING FOR.
IN TERMS OF ENFORCING THIS, THE COMPANY IS OUT OF CALIFORNIA THAT DOES THIS, BUT THEY HAVE DONE ALSO VARIOUS CELL TOWER PROJECTS FOR US WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT OVER THE YEARS.
IT IS NOT LIKE NEW ENTITY. SOMEBODY THAT IS TRUE IN TERMS OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS THAT THEY PROVIDE.
IN ONE SENSE, WE ARE DEPENDENT ON THEM AND THEIR EXPERTISE.
>> MR. CHAIR, IF I COULD MAKE A RECOMMENDATION WHEN WE HAVE THE PRESENTATION AND MAYBE I WILL
HAVE MORE QUESTIONS AT THAT TIME. >> GREAT. ALL RIGHT.
ANY FURTHER COMMENTS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS? OKAY.
LET'S PROCEED. AT THIS POINT IN TIME, WE'LL ASK MR. MIKE POWERS TO COME UP. YOU HAVE SOME COMMENT YOU WANT TO MAKE.
>> HELLO COMMISSIONERS, I APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO TALK ABOUT THIS APPLICATION. MY NAME IS MIKE POWERS.
I REPRESENT ATLAS TOWER. ATLAS TOWER, IN THIS CASE, IS THE APPLICANT.
I WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT VERIZON IS THE FIRST USER OF THE SITE AND FOR SOME OF THE COMPLIANCE SOME OF THE SPECIFIC COMPLIANCE WILL BE MOSTLY OR PARTIALLY MONITORED BY VERIZON.
LET ME GIVE YOU THE BIG PICTURE. WHEN WIRELESS WAS NEW, GENERALLY SPEAKING, THE CARRIERS VERIZON AT&T, WHAT HAVE YOU, BUILDING THEIR OWN NETWORK, BUILDING THEIR OWN TOWERS AND NOT SHARING THEIR TOWERS.
[00:25:02]
MUNICIPALITY OR COUNTY DON'T WANT TOWERS IF YOU DON'T NEED EXTRA TOWERS.INTRODUCE THIS THING CALL CO LOCATION. CO LOCATION IS GREAT BECAUSE YOU HAVE THE ABILITY TO FORCE THE CARRIERS AND THE TOWER COMPANIES TO SHARE ASSET FOR COMMUNITY. THAT'S WHAT IS HAPPENING IN THIS SITE.
VERIZON APPROACHED US FIRST BECAUSE THEY DO HAVE A COMMITMENT TO THE FCC TO PROVIDE COVERAGE TO THEIR CUSTOMERS IN THIS AREA. AND THIS PARTICULAR AREA IS QUITE UNCOVERED.
NORMALLY, WHEN I WORK ON A SITE IN THE U.S, GENERALLY SPEAKING, THE FOCUS IS BANDWIDTH.
THE DAY IS NOT GOING FAST ENOUGH. NOT GETTING THE CAT VIDEO ENOUGH.
THIS SITE IS BOTH COVERAGE AND CAPACITY. THIS SITE IS NEEDED FOR THE COMMUNITY TO HAVE ESSENTIALLY SERVICE AND IT WILL BE BIG BENEFIT FOR FIRST RESPONDER COMMUNITY AND SO ON. FROM A BUSINESS POINT OF VIEW, WHAT IS HAPPENING HERE, VERIZON IS TAKING A LARGE CAP X, PROBABLY A MILLION DOLLARS OR MORE TO DEVELOP THE ENTIRE SITE AND CONVERTING TO OPERATING EXPENSE BY HAVING ATLAS BUILD THE SITE AND OWN THE SITE AND BACK TO THEM.
WHAT DOES IT MEAN? ATLAS IS THE CUSTODIAN OF THIS ASSET IN YOUR COMMUNITY, ASSUMING WE GET A PROVIDE AND BUILD THIS FOR YOU, SO WE WILL BE THE FIRST ONES TO RESPOND TO MAKE SURE ALL OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ARE MET NOT JUST WHEN WE BUILD IT AS LONG AS THIS TOWER IS THERE. ATLAS TOWER IS YOUR GO TO, TO MAKE SURE WE ARE COMPLYING WITH CODE.
WHEN IT COMES TO FCC COMPLIANCE, VERIZON HAS DIFFERENT LEVEL OF COMPLIANCE THAT THEY HAVE TO WORK ON TO MAKE SURE THEIR EQUIPMENT IS COMPLIANT, IT IS SAFE, IT IS CONFORMING WITH FEDERAL LAW.
IT IS KIND OF SIMPLE BECAUSE ATLAS IS THE OWNER OF THE TOWER.
WE ARE THE FIRST PERSON TO GO TO. WHEN VERIZON AND AT&T, YOU CAN STILL COME DIRECTLY TO US AND IF WE HAVE TO TALK TO OTHER TOWER USERS OF THE TOWER WE WILL MAKE SURE THAT THEY ARE IN COMPLIANCE. THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL THAT WERE CREATED WITH THE PLANNING GROUP HERE IN THE CITY AND ALSO WITH THE SPECIALIST ARE VERY THOROUGH.
ONE OF THE MOST THOROUGH REPORTS THAT I HAVE WORKED ON IN QUITE A WHILE AND WE AGREED TO COMPLY WITH THOSE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. WITH THAT, I WILL STOP.
IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT ANYTHING RELATED TO THIS, I'D BE HAPPY TO TALK ABOUT IT.
I DO URGE YOU TO CONSIDER ALL OF THE WORK THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT HAS DONE TO MAKE SURE THE TOWER IS COMPLIANT WITH THE RULES AND REGULATIONS AND I ASSURE IT IS GOING TO BE GREAT ASSET FOR YOUR COMMUNITY.
THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. >> MR. CHAIR, IF I CAN ASK A QUESTION OF MR. POWERS. THE DESIGN OF THIS IT LOOKS LIKE YOU ARE NOT BUILDING LARGE PAD OR ANYTHING, IS THAT
ACCURATE? >> PAD YOU ARE REFERRING TO FOUNDATION?
>> RIGHT. LARGE FOUNDATION. >> SO THIS, AS I UNDERSTAND IT, THE TOWER WILL BE PAD AND PURE FOUNDATION. PAD AND PURE FOUNDATION IS EASY TO VISUALIZED.
WE WILL BE TAKING OUT, LET'S SAY, 12 FEET BY 12 FEET BY 12 FEET OF DIRT.
12 FEET IN ALL DIRECTIONS AND PUT ALL OF THAT SOIL ASIDE, WE WILL LITERALLY POUR
[00:30:08]
A BASKETBALL YOU KNOW, ANYWAY. CONCRETE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE HOLE AND ENGINEER WILL REBAR AND PLOW ON THE GROUND AND THE DIRT GOES BACK ON TOP OF THE BASKETBALL COURT AND THE DESIGN ALLOWS FOR THE FOUNDATION TO BE VERY STRONG AND OBVIOUSLY UNSEEN AFTER WE RE CLIMATE WITH THE DIRT. THIS PARTICULAR POWER IS SST.IT HAS THREE LEGS. THE BASKETBALL COURT WILL HAVE 3 CASE ONES COMING UP FLEW
THE GROUND AND THEN IT WILL BE BOLTED ON. >> JUST ANOTHER QUESTION ON I'M SURE IT HAS WIND RATING AND YOU LOOKED AT WIND PATTERNS AND MAKE SURE IT IS ABLE TO HANDLE THAT?
>> YEAH. THIS IS INTERESTING TOPIC FOR ME, THERE'S THIS IDEA THAT TOWERS FALL DOWN AND ALL HISTORIC TOWERS DID FALL DOWN AND SOMETIMES DO FALL DOWN.
OVERTIME, THE TOWER CODE, THE NATIONAL BUILDING CODE FOR TOWERS HAS BEEN AMENDED MANY, MANY TIMES.
THE CURRENT CODE IS VERY SPECIFIC ABOUT BEING ABLE TO NOT JUST HANDLING THE WEIGHT LOAD, THE SWAY OF WIND, ICE AND ALL OF THAT.
ALSO, THINGS LIKE A HURRICANE OR AN EARTHQUAKE ALL OF THE THINGS ARE PACKED IN TOWER CODE AND IT IS VERY SPECIFIC, SO I CAN SAY HONESTLY TOWERS DON'T FALL DOWN. YOU ARE GOING TO SAY I HEAR THE STORY ABOUT, WHAT I AM GOING TO SAY EXCEPT IF IT IS HIT WITH THE FORCE THAT IS BEYOND WAY BEYOND WHAT IS EXPECTED WHETHER IT IS MOTHER NATURE OR AIRPLANE OR DRUNK DRIVING CAR OR EXPLOSION.
GENERALLY SPEAKING, THESE TOWERS ARE ENGINEERED TO BE INCREDIBLE SAFE.
THE WAYS THAT HAPPENED IN THE 90'S AND 80'S IS GONE.
WAY SAFETY DESIGN. >> IT IS AT THE PLEASURE OF THE CHAIR.
>> IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO ASK A QUESTION, GO AHEAD. >> (TALKING AWAY FROM MIC).
>> WOULD YOU COME TO THE PODIUM PLEASE. >> STATE YOUR NAME.
>> I HAD A QUESTION OF THE PICTURE. CAN YOU TELL ME IS THAT FACING NORTH, EAST? IS THIS A ROAD? WHAT SIDE OF THE ROAD OR WHAT DIRECTION WE ARE FACING WHEN THE PICTURE IS TAKEN.
>> I MAY BE ABLE TO FIGURE IT OUT FROM THE PACKET HERE. UNFORTUNATELY, I AM NOT PERSONALLY FAMILIAR WITH THIS SPECIFIC SITE.
I DON'T THINK I WILL BE ABLE TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, I'M SORRY.
>> C2 IN THE PACKAGE COMING OFF ON COUNTY ROAD 11.
OLD HIGHWAY 44. AS I LOOK AT THIS, IT WOULD BE WEST OF COUNTY ROAD 11.
>> THE PICTURE THAT I HAD IT LOOKS LIKE IT WAS ON THE EAST SIDE OF THAT ROAD.
[00:35:03]
NOT ON THE WEST SIDE. THE TOWER BUILT ON THE EAST SIDE.YOU ARE SAYING IT IS ON THE WEST SIDE? >> LET ME TRY TO FIND A SCHEMATIC FOR YOU.
>> EVERYTHING THAT WE HAVE IT SHOWS ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE DIAGRAM.
ALL OF THE PLATES, ALL OF THE NARRATIVE.
>> (TALKING AWAY FROM MIC). >> SHALL WE PROCEED?
THANK YOU, SIR. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. >> STATE YOUR NAME.
>> MY NAME IS FATHER CHRISTOPHER. NOT TIE TO THE CHURCH.
IT IS PRIVATE PROPERTY AND GIVEN NOTICE ON MY PROPERTY THAT I INHERITED FROM MY FATHER IS WEST OF THAT HIGHWAY. I'M A LITTLE CONFUSED BECAUSE I CAN'T FIND THE PICTURE.
THE ONE THAT I GOT IT LOOKS LIKE THE HIGHWAY RUNS FROM SOUTH TO NORTH AND THE TOWER IS SUPPOSED TO BE BUILT ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE HIGHWAY. YOU ARE SAYING ON THE WEST SIDE.
I AM TRYING TO THINK WHERE IN RELATION TO MY PROPERTY.
>> SIR, WE DON'T KNOW WHERE YOUR PROPERTY IS.
>> WELL, I MEAN . >> WHAT I DO KNOW IT IS ON THE WEST SIDE OF HIGHWAY 44.
THIS PROJECT IS ON THE WEST SIDE OF HIGHWAY 44.
I DON'T KNOW WHERE YOUR PROPERTY IS. >> MY PROPERTY IS ON THE WEST
SIDE OF HIGHWAY 44. >> IF I HAD A MAP WHERE YOU DREW AN X ON PROPERTY THAT WOULD BE HELPFUL.
IF YOU CAN PREPARE A MAP FOR ME. COMING UP TO THE MEETING AND SAYING THAT YOUR PROPERTY IS WITHIN CERTAIN FAMILIES I DON'T KNOW WHERE TO LOCATE IN CONTRAST TO THIS.
IT IS AT DISCRETION OF CHAIR. >> I MENTIONED TOO IMMEDIATE CONCERNS.
TWO UNDER FOOT HIGH TOWER IS BIG TOWER AND THESE THINGS ARE EYE SORT.
IF YOU HAVE A VIEW OF SANDY AS A TOWER TO BE WITH YOU AND SANDY AS THAT'S A NEGATIVE THING.
ALSO THE PROPERTY VALUE AROUND THAT PROPERTY WILL GO DOWN BECAUSE OF THIS TOWER.
A BOOM FOR THE PEOPLE THAT HAVE THE TOWER BECAUSE THEY GET LEASE PROPERTY.
THE PROPERTY VALUE GOES DOWN AND THAT WILL AFFECT THE PROPERTY AS FAR AS VALUE GOES.
A LITTLE MORE LONG TERM, THAT'S A POPULATED AREA.
I HAVE, GOD WILLING, TO HAVE A COLLEGE, SEMINARY TO HAVE ON MY PROPERTY AND HOUSING THAT WILL HAVE FAMILIES, FACULTY. IF YOU KNOW CUBA, NO PLACE TO RENT FOR THE MOST PART.
THAT'S WHAT I HAVE IN MIND. THE IDEA THAT THE COMMISSION HAS THIS TOWER IS GOING TO BE SPARSELY POPULATED AREA, IT IS NOW. NOW, WHAT WE HAVE ON PROPERTY WE LEASE TO A MAN THAT HAS CATTLE BUT THAT'S NOT WHAT I HAVE FOR THE NEAR FUTURE.
SAINT JOHN'S COLLEGE IN SANTA FE, SIMILAR TO THAT.
WE DON'T HAVE LONG TERM SCIENTIFIC STUDIES OF 5G.
THERE'S A CAUSE OF CONCERN FOR THE EFFECTS OF RADIATION.
IF YOU HAVE A TOWER, IT RADIATES 24 HOURS A DAY AND 7 DAYS A WEEK.
WHEN YOU LOOK TO THE MOUNTAIN, YOU WILL SEE THE LIGHT AND TOWER.
YOU TELL ME ON THE WEST SIDE, I AM CONCERNED.
I THOUGHT THIS THING ON THE EAST SIDE BECAUSE MY PROPERTY ON THE WEST SIDE.
IF THE THING IS CLOSED TO MY PROPERTY, I HAVE BEEN READING WITHIN 500 METERS ADVERSE EFFECTS.
[00:40:09]
WANT ME TO MENTION SOME OF THEM? HEADACHES, DIZZINESS, INSOMNIA, DEPRESSION, FATIGUE, LEUKEMIA AND CHILDREN ARE VULNERABLE BECAUSE THEY HAVE THIN SKULLS.I HAVE A WHOLE BAG HERE. I GRANT YOU. PEOPLE SAY WE DON'T HAVE INFORMATION TO SAY THIS IS SUCH AND SUCH THREAT OR DANGER, A HEALTH HAZARD. A LOT OF EVIDENCE THAT INDICATES IT IS.
WHAT IT ASKS, MORATORIUM UNTIL WE HAVE MORE INFORMATION.
ONLY POSSIBLE TO ASSESS THE DANGERS OF MOBILE COMMUNICATION THE THING I WISH TO EMPHASIZE WHAT THE FCC ALLOWS BASED ON OUTDATED INFORMATION FROM 1996.
THERE IS NO CURRENT, WHAT THEY MEASURE IS THE THERMAL EFFECTS.
THERE ARE MANY OTHER EFFECTS. IF I CAN END WITH THIS, THERE SHOULD BE MORATORIUM WISELY USED MANY YEARS OF ECOLOGICAL DAMAGED HAD APPEAR.
THIS IS A GROUP OF SCIENTISTS. THEY SAY, REPORTS FROM THE FCC AND FDAA, THE METHODOLOGY IS BASED ON FALSE PREMISES, IT IS BASED ON INFORMATION FROM 30 YEARS AGO WHICH ONLY MEASURES THE TERMINAL EFFECTS OF THE RADIATION.
MANY OTHER EFFECTS. NOT WITH HUMANS SO MUCH BECAUSE IT IS NEW BUT WITH RATS AND ANIMALS, INDICATION THAT THE RADIATION IS HARMFUL TO LIVING THINGS.
I WOULD ASK YOU TO CONSIDER. MAYBE MOVE IT AWAY.
IF YOU ARE CLOSE TO THESE THINGS, WITHIN 500 FEET, I THINK I'M NOT SURE IF IT IS A STANDARD THING. YOU CAN'T BUILD NEAR A SCHOOL BECAUSE VERY HARMFUL TO YOUNG CHILDREN IN THEIR DEVELOPMENT AND SUCH AND SUCH. PERHAPS THEY CAN CONSIDER ANOTHER SITE.
IF THAT'S ON THE WEST SIDE, MY PROPERTY ON THE WEST SIDE AND THAT'S CLOSER THAN WHAT I THOUGHT. I DON'T WANT TO GIVE UP THE PROJECT BECAUSE OF THE DANGER LIVING AND WORKING AT THE COLLEGE.
>> WE HAVE GIVEN YOU MORE THAN THE 3 MINUTES.
THANK YOU SO MUCH. OKAY. THAT'S IT ON COMMENTS.
ANY FURTHER COMMENTS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS? >> MR. CHAIR, ALL I SAY, AS I LOOK AT THE Z1 THE LAYOUT THE A JOINING PROPERTY IS RODRIGUEZ ANTONIO AND THE OTHER ONE IS ALL OF THE SAME PROPERTY OWNER.
I DON'T THINK IT IS BUTTED UP AGAINST YOURS, SIR.
>> (TALKING AWAY FROM MIC) SENT MY THE COMMISSIONERS OR SOMEBODY HERE, THE TOWER LOOKED TO ME.
YOU HAVE THE ROAD HERE AND MY PROPERTY WAS JUST DIRECTLY WEST THAT WAS THE PICTURE THAT I WAS SENT. MAYBE THERE'S BEEN A CHANGE. MAYBE NOT.
THAT'S THE PICTURE THAT YOU SENT ME THAT HAD THE LITTLE SOMETHING LIKE THAT.
IT HAD THE ROAD. FROM WHAT I REMEMBER, THE PROPOSED SIDE OF THE TOWER ON THE EAST SIDE. IF I LOOK TOWARD THE MOUNTAIN, THAT'S WHERE I THOUGHT THE TOWER GOING TO BE BUT YOU ARE SAYING ON THE WEST SIDE.
>> I THINK ALWAYS BEEN ON THE WEST SIDE. DIDN'T GET CHANGED.
>> DO YOU HAVE NUMBERS WHERE I CAN LOCATE IT EXACTLY?
>> SURVEY. >> SO MANY DEGREES SO I CAN LOCATE WHERE THAT IS.
CAN YOU GIVE ME THE NUMBERS OR SEND TO ME. >>
[00:45:08]
THE MAP SHOWS THE LOCATION OF THE SITE. YOU SHOULD HAVE PROPERTIES ON YOUR PROPERTY.4. >> LOOKING UP IS SOUTH? >> LOOKING UP IS NORTH.
>> THAT’S ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE HIGHWAY. >> YOU ARE RIGHT.
IT IS ON THE EAST SIDE. IF THE PICTURE WAS TAKEN FROM U.S HIGHWAY 550 ON THE EAST SIDE.
IF PICTURE TAKEN FROM OLD HEY 44, ON THE WEST SIDE.
>> THAT’S WHAT I HAD FROM THE NEW HIGHWAY. IT IS BETWEEN THE NEW AND THE OLD?
>> THAT’S WHAT IT PEARS. >> BETWEEN 550 AND 44 ADJACENT TO WEST 44.
>> OKAY. AGAIN, I HAVE CONCERN BECAUSE I THINK IT IS CLOSER TO MY PROPERTY.
CAN YOU TELL ME THE PROPERTY OF THE PROPOSED SITE?
>> YOU WOULD HAVE TO DIRECT THE QUESTION TO THE CHAIR.
>> WHO OWNS THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE TOWER?
>> CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, THE ASSESSORS OFFICE HAS THE INFORMATION AND THE GENTLEMAN CAN VISIT THE ASSESSOR'S OFFICE AND LOOK AT THE WEBSITE AS WELL IF YOU COME TO THE OFFICE IF YOU NEEDED TO KNOW WHO THE PROPERTY OWNERS WERE ALL AROUND.
WE CERTAINLY HAVE THE INFORMATION WITHIN COUNTY RECORDS.
>> I KNOW THE PROPERTY OWNERS AROUND MY PROPERTY.
I AM STILL CONFUSED AS TO WHERE THIS IS. >> NOT KNOWING WHERE YOUR PROPERTY IS.
I DON'T THINK WE CAN IDENTIFY IT AND HELP YOU ON THAT.
>> I DON'T WANT TO TAKE YOUR TIME. IT HAS A NAME, RIGHT? SAN MIGUEL, RIGHT? SAN MIGUEL IS THE NAME OF THE AREA.
IT IS CALL SAN MIGUEL. I DON'T MEAN TO TAKE YOUR TIME.
I AM CONFUSED. I AM CONCERNED AND I WOULD LIKE TO REITERATE THE DANGER THAT IT MIGHT POSE TO THE PEOPLE THAT WILL BE LIVING NO THAT AREA WITH THIS PROJECT OF MINE.
NO FURTHER COMMENTS? >> I DO. FOR MR. POWER, I LOOKED AT PAGE 10 OF 29 OF THE ANSWERS THAT YOU GAVE TO THE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION ORDINANCE WITH SANDOVAL COUNTY.
IN PARTICULAR, I AM LOOKING AT SUBSECTION J. IT SAYS APPLICANT MAY BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT ANALYSIS AND VISUAL ADDENDUM. I THINK YOUR RESPONSE WAS APPLICANT HAS INCLUDED PHOTO SIMULATIONS, ATLAS, SAN PABLO...(READING). I WON'T READ THE WHOLE THING.
WHAT IS IT THAT YOU DID WHAT DOES IT MEAN? FOR ME, IT DOESN'T LOOK LIKE YOU DID ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OR ANALYSIS. DID YOU JUST TAKE PICTURES AND SUBMIT IN LIEU OF THAT?
>> NO, WE DID SEVERAL THINGS. INCLUDING THE REPORT AND THE PHASE 1 WHICH IS SPECIFIC TO THE LAND AND THE USE OF THE LAND, HISTORIC LAND AND TAKING CARE OF ISSUES FOR ENDANGERED SPECIES AND SO ON. WE DID SOMETHING DIFFERENT, PHOTO SIMULATION GIVEN TO STAFF THAT SHOWS VISUAL
OF WHAT IT GENERALLY WOULD LOOK LIKE. >> THE REASON I WAS ASKING FOR THE QUESTION, FOR MR. HERRERA, SO HE UNDERSTOOD ONE OF THE QUESTIONS HE HAD NOTHING DONE JUST PICK OF SITE. EXPLAIN TO HIM, THINGS THAT WERE DONE ENVIRONMENTAL WISE AS YOU EXPLAINED AND VISUAL WISE TO SEE WHERE IT WAS GOING TO BE.
[00:50:08]
HOW THIS PARTICULAR SITE WOULD IMPACT WITH WHAT IS AROUND THERE?>> I HAVE MANY COMMENTS. THE ONE THAT IS MOST POIGNANT OR RESPONSIVE TO HIS COMMENTS, CONCERNED ABOUT HEALTH. QUITE FRANKLY THIS ISSUE IS SO HORRIBLY TWISTED IN THE INTERNET THAT THE INFORMATION PEOPLE ARE READING IS POTENTIALLY WRONG ALMOST ALL OF THE TIME.
FOR INSTANCE, REPEATED A MOMENT AGO THAT THE SAFETY TESTING FOR TELL COMMUNICATION AND USING RADIO FREQUENCIES TO HAVE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NOT CHANGED SINCE 1996, THAT'S TOTALLY WRONG.
THE ENABLING ACT OF 1996 WHICH IS CALL TELE COM ACT PASSED BY CONGRESS CREATED A FRAMEWORK, A CONSTITUTION IF YOU WILL TO ALLOW CONGRESS TO CREATE A BODY THAT COULD STUDY ALL OF THE NEW TECHNOLOGY OVERTIME TO MAKE SURE IT WAS SAFE.
1996 LEGISLATION IS ESTHETIC. THAT LICENSE IS NOT GIVENS EASILY.
THERE'S SO MUCH INFORMATION TWISTED IN THE INTERNET THAT IS NOW A FEDERAL LAW PURSUANT TO MANY FEDERAL CASES THAT THIS BODY CANNOT CONSIDER WHETHER OR NOT THE EQUIPMENT IS SAFE OR NOT. NOT BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT WORRIED ABOUT IT BEING SAFE. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAS PREEMPTED THIS AREA.
WE CAN TALK ABOUT ANYTHING WE WANT. WE CAN TALK ALL NIGHT ABOUT WHAT WE THINK IS GOING ON.
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAS SAID MUNICIPALITIES CANNOT RULE ON THIS.
AN EXAMPLE WOULD BE OR ANALOGY WOULD BE IF THIS BODY, THIS GROUP DECIDED THAT IBUPROFEN IS DANGER AND BAD FOR COMMUNITY AND MAYBE YOU PUT RULES HOW MANY TABLETS YOU COULD HAVE OR A DOCTOR'S PRESCRIPTION OR SOMETHING, YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO DO THAT.
WHY NOT? THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THROUGH THE FDA HAS COMPLETELY TAKEN OVER THE SPECIFIC AREA OF COMPLIANCE. AND THE EXACTLY SAME HERE. IT IS FRUSTRATING BECAUSE I KNOW AS AN EXPERT, I HAVE BEEN IN THE INDUSTRY FOR 17 YEARS, I KNOW THE EQUIPMENT IS RIGOROUSLY TESTED AND IT IS SAFE, 80% OF WHAT I READ ON THE INTERNET IS NOT REAL. IT IS FRUSTRATING. BUT I CAN SAY IN MY EXPERT OPINION AND MY CONCERN ABOUT HEALTH AS WELL THIS IS A SAFE USE FOR THE COMMUNITY.
RF COMMUNICATION BEEN USED SINCE 1920. IT IS THE SAME.
PROPAGATING RADIO FREQUENCIES TO MAKE COMMUNICATION HAPPEN.
IT IS SAFE AND I DON'T THINK IT IS AN ISSUE. >> THE OTHER THING THAT I HAVE MR. CHAIR THE OTHER THING NOT NECESSARILY FOR YOU.
I AM DONE WITH YOU. TO ADDRESS MR. HERRERA'S CONCERN, WE ARE THE SECOND STEP FOR THE FINAL STEP.
WHATEVER WE RECOMMEND, IT WOULD GO TO THE COUNTY COMMISSION.
YOU WILL HAVE COMMUNITY AT THAT POINT. WHAT I WAS GOING TO RECOMMEND .
>> CHAIR, COMMISSIONER RODRIGUEZ, IT IS DIFFERENT WITH THE CONDITIONAL USE.
IT IS NOT ZONE CHANGE WHERE IT IS THE CASE. >> IS THERE AN
[00:55:07]
APPEAL PROCESS TO THAT? >> THERE’S AN APPEAL IN EVERY SITUATION, BUT AS FAR AS THE INITIAL THRESHOLD OF APPROVAL AS OPPOSED TO MAKING RECOMMENDATION TO THE GOVERNING BODY, DECIDING TO APPROVED OR DENIED.
>> THANK YOU FOR THAT. I STAND CORRECTED. WHAT I AM TRYING TO SAY, FATHER, I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT STAFF MR. HERRERA A COPY OF THE ATLAS TOWER PAGE 1 WHICH HAS THE COORDINATES AND SITE LOCATION, IF HE IS CONCERNED.
YOU CAN GO TO THE ASSESSOR AND FIGURE WHERE YOUR PROPERTY IS THAT.
I DON'T KNOW HOW THE BODY IS GOING TO VOTE. IF THERE'S APPEAL PROCESS, YOU CAN UTILIZE THAT INFORMATION TO APPEAL ANY CONCERNS THAT YOU MAY HAVE. IT IS NOT THAT WE DON'T WANT TO HEAR YOU.
YOU CAME WITH LIMITED INFORMATION. IF THEY GAVE YOU A COPY OF THIS AND NOT SATISFIED, YOU HAVE ANOTHER AVENUE THAT YOU CAN GO IF YOU DISAGREE WITH THE ULTIMATE DECISION.
I DON'T KNOW. I WANTED TO GIVE YOU THE OPPORTUNITY.
THE LAST THING THAT I HAVE FOR MR. BEAMAN, MR. CHAIR. WHAT I RECOMMEND ON THE CONDITIONAL APPROVAL OF THIS ITEM, I WOULD LIKE TO SEE SECTION 10 ON THE LAST PAGE PAGE 5, IT WOULD JUST READ THE APPLICANT SHALL COMPLY CLEARLY WITH THE SANDOVAL COUNTY APPENDIX A ZONING ORDINANCE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES.
THAT ORDINANCE. MR. POWER DID GOOD WORK ON HOW TO COMPLY WITH THAT.
>> (TALKING AWAY FROM MIC). >> YES, SIR. >> (TALKING AWAY FROM
MR. CHAIR, I MAKE A MOTION . >> (TALKING AWAY
FROM MIC). >> MR. CHAIR, I MAKE A MOTION I DON'T HAVE TO REPEAT ALL OF THAT.
WE APPROVE THE PARTICULAR ITEM WITH THE CONDITION THAT WE ADD THE AMENDMENT UNDER THE RECOMMENDATION FOR UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF LET ME MAKE SURE I GET THE LANGUAGE RIGHT.
SUBSECTION 10 THAT SAYS SOMETHING TO THE EFFECT AND I WILL LEAVE TO STAFF HOW THEY WORD IT.
PRETTY MUCH THE APPLICANT SHALL MAINTAIN AND ADHERE COMPLIANCE OF THE SANDOVAL COUNTY CODE OF ORDINANCES APPENDIX A, ZONING ORDINANCE ARTICLE III WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES.
>> SO MOVED. >> I’LL SECOND. >> I THINK WE'RE IN THE MIDDLE OF VOTING RIGHT NOW. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. CAN WE DO ROLL.
>> OKAY. DID YOU HAVE A SHORT COMMENT TO MAKE? WE HAVE GIVEN YOU MORE TIME THAN THE AVERAGE.
PLEASE MAKE IT SHORT. >> THIS GENTLEMAN ASKED ME IF I KNEW THE COORDINATES.
>> KEEP THE COORDINATES FOR ANY APPEAL YOU MAY WANT.
>> IF I KNOW WHERE MY PROPERTY IS, I WILL LET IT DROP.
[01:00:01]
>> VERY GOOD. >> THE COORDINATES ARE 35 CAN YOU LOCATE OR SOMEBODY?
OKAY. ALL RIGHT. ANY RESOLUTIONS? LET ME SEE APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 6 10
[9. RESOLUTIONS]
205.9. >> CHAIR, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, OUR LAST MEETING BROUGHT THIS BEFORE YOU IN FORM OF A DRAFT. WHAT THIS IS A RESOLUTION TO INCREASE THE RADIUS OF NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING.
THERE WERE SOME RECOMMENDED CHANGES THAT KIND OF CLARIFIED AND THIS WOULD BE UNDER SECTION 17 CONDITION USES C5 IN THAT PARAGRAPH TOWARD THE MIDDLE OF THE PARAGRAPH.
IT READS; IN ADDITION TO THOSE REQUIREMENTS THE APPLICANT SHALL POST TO MAINTAIN VOTING SITES BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AT A CAN AND THIS IS PUBLICLY VIABLE.
SOMETHING THAT COMMISSIONER SIMPSON RECOMMENDED AND COMMISSIONER RODRIGUEZ, SPECIFICALLY, REFERENCED SIGN LOCATION IN VIEW OF THE PUBLIC.
WE INSERTED THAT LANGUAGE ALSO BEFORE DESIGNATED BY THE ZONING OFFICER.
NOW THIS IS STILL IN DRAFT FORMAT. IT IS IN THE FORMAT OF EVERYONE'S SIGNATURE. IF THERE IS NO MORE CHANGES, I CAN FINALIZE THIS AND MAKE ARRANGEMENTS TO HAVE THE SIGNATURES ENTERED.
THAT DOESN'T HAVE TO OCCUR TONIGHT AS FAR AS THE SIGNATURES BUT I WANTED TO MOVE FORWARD.
THE NEXT STEP, ONCE IT IS AGREED UPON AND SIGN, I WOULD PUT ON THE GOVERNING BODY AGENDA TO PUBLISH AND POST ORDINANCE TO CHANGE THE LANGUAGE.
>> MY ONLY CONCERN, MR. CHAIR, ARE WE MISSING PAGES TO THE RESOLUTION.
I SEE GO FROM IS THERE STUFF IN BETWEEN THERE?
>> THERE’S PAGE 1, PAGE 2, AND PAGE 3. IT IS VERY SHORT.
IT IS REALLY JUST CHANGING ONE PARAGRAPH. I INCLUDED BOTH PARAGRAPHS.
>> I SEE IT NOW. I'M SORRY. >> THAT WOULD BE ON PAGE 2.
>> PAGE 2, SUBSECTION 5. >> THAT’S MY IMPRESSION OF CAPTURING OF WHAT YOU WANTED LAST TIME.
17C? >> THAT’S CORRECT. >> THANK YOU. >> WE WORKED HARD ON IT AND MOVE IT ALONG.
>> I THINK WE NEED TO FIND OUT FROM MR. RODRIGUEZ, DOES IT SAY NOW WHAT YOU WANT IT TO SAY?
>> HE WAS ASKING HIM THAT. COMMISSION RODRIGUEZ, I THINK IT DOES.
>> THAT’S THE LANGUAGE THAT WE DISCUSSED. THE CHANGE HAD OCCURRED IN THE PARAGRAPH BEFORE WHICH WAS PARAGRAPH C4 WHERE IT REFERENCES THE PARAMETERS.
IN OTHER WORDS, UP TO 300 FEET AS OPPOSED TO 100 FEET AS LISTED BEFORE.
>> THE ONLY THING, DIRECTOR BEAMAN, I KNOW THE COLOR CAME UP.
[01:05:03]
I ASSUMED SINCE IT IS NOT IN THERE, WE ARE LEAVING IN DISCRETION OF FOLKS WHAT IS THE BEST COLOR FOR THAT?>> THAT'S MY UNDERSTANDING. AGAIN, THAT'S ALSO THAT WE CAN REVISIT.
YOU KNOW, IF NEEDED. >> MR. CHAIRMAN, I WILL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THE RESOLUTION NUMBER 6 10 25.9 FOR MR. BEAMAN TO FINALIZE
FOR SIGNATURE. >> CAN I HAVE A SECOND? >> I WILL SECOND THAT.
>> WE HAVE A SECOND. CAN WE DO ROLL.
NUMBER 10; APPROVALS. >> I HAVE NO ITEMS FOR APPROVALS TONIGHT.
>> I DIDN'T SEE ANY. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. EXCELLENT.
WELL, I WILL ANNOUNCE OUR NEXT BOARD OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIONERS MEETING, WHICH IS JULY 8,
[11. ANNOUNCEMENT OF THE NEXT BOARD OF PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSIONERS MEETING ON JULY 8, 2025 AT 5:00PM.]
2025, AT 5:00 P.M. OKAY. LET'S MOVE ON. ANY DISCUSSIONS FROM THE COMMISSIONERS? NO FURTHER DISCUSSIONS. OKAY. I ADJOURN THIS MEETING AT 6:59 P.M.* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.